HTML draft version timeline
October 1991
HTML Tags, an informal document (cern) that lists 18 HTML tags, was first mentioned in public.
June 1992
First informal draft of the DTD HTML, with several subsequent revisions (July 15, August 6, August 18, November 17, November 19, November 20, November 22)
November 1992
HTML DTD (the first with a version number, based on RCS revisions, starting instead of 1.0), an informal draft.
June 1993
The IETF IIIR Working Group published the Hypertext Markup Language as an Internet draft (an approximate proposal for a standard). It was replaced by a second version a month later
November 1993
HTML + was published by the IETF as an Internet draft and was a competitive proposal to the hypertext markup language draft. It expired in July 1994.
November 1994
First draft (revision 00) of HTML 2.0 published by the IETF itself (called "HTML 2.0" of revision 02), which ultimately led to the publication of RFC 1866 in November 1995.
April 1995 (author March 1995)
HTML 3.0 was proposed as a standard for the IETF, but the proposal expired five months later (September 28, 1995) without further action. It included many of the capabilities that were in Raggett's HTML + proposal, such as table support, text flow around figures, and the display of complex mathematical formulas.
W3C started developing its own Arena browser as a test bed for HTML 3 and Cascading Style Sheets, but HTML 3.0 was unsuccessful for various reasons. The draft was considered very large, at 150 pages, and the pace of development of the browser, as well as the number of stakeholders, had exceeded the resources of the IETF. Browser providers, including Microsoft and Netscape at the time, chose to implement different subsets of draft HTML 3 features, as well as introduce their own extensions (see Browser Wars). These included extensions to control the stylistic aspects of documents, contrary to the "belief [of the academic engineering community] that things like text color, background texture, font size, and font face they were definitely beyond the reach of a language when their sole intention was to specify how a document would be organized. " Dave Raggett, who has been a member of the W3C for many years, has commented, for example, "To some extent, Microsoft built its business on the Web by expanding HTML functionality."
HTML5 official logo
Html draft version timeline |
0 Comments